Dismissed
Arshad Ali v. State Gnctd
Delhi HCBAIL APPLN./769/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The applicants surrendered before the Trial Court, rendering the bail applications infructuous. The counsel requested withdrawal.
What did the court decide?
Bail applications dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~4 & 5
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI (4) BAIL APPLN. 521/2024 (5)+ BAIL APPLN. 769/2024 ZAID ..... Applicant ARSHAD ALI ..... Applicant Through: Ms.Pratiksha Tripathi, Mr.Rohit Kumar and Ms.Himanshi Singh, Advs. (through VC) versus
¶3
- THE STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Aman Usman, APP with SI Saurabh
¶4
CORAM:
¶5
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA O R D E R % 10.05.2024
¶6
- The learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants have surrendered before the learned Trial Court and, therefore, these applications have been rendered infructuous. She submits that she has instructions to withdraw the same.
¶7
- The bail applications are, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.
¶8
NAVIN CHAWLA, J
¶9
MAY 10, 2024 /ns
¶10
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Zaid
- applicant
Arshad Ali
- respondent
The State
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court