Allowed

Aditya Kumar v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

Delhi HC19 Feb 2024BAIL APPLN./583/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge order granting pre-arrest bail under Section 438 CrPC to the applicant in an FIR involving cheating and criminal conspiracy. The court observed that allegations were based solely on complainant statements with ladd in complaint years and issued bonds with conditions.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted on a personal bond of ₹50,000 with two sureties of the like amount, subject to specific conditions.

Aditya Kumar Vs State Govt. of NCT of Delhi — Cheating and Forgery | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~58

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- BAIL APPLN. 583/2024

¶4

ADITYA KUMAR ..... Applicant Through: Mr. Prabhoo Dayal Tiwari, Mrs. Manisha Tiwari and Mr. Surya Kumar, Advs.

¶5

versus

¶6

STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State with SI Parmender Kumar, PS Rani Bagh, Delhi.

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN O R D E R % 19.02.2024

¶9

The present application is filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking grant of pre-arrest bail in FIR No. 109/2023 dated 14.04.2023, registered at Police Station Rani Bagh, for offences under Sections 420/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

¶10

It is pointed out that the co-accused against whom similar role is alleged, was admitted on pre-arrest bail by order dated 08.02.2024, passed by this Court in BAIL APPLN. 3657/2023.

¶11

This Court, while granting bail to the co-accused ‘Brijesh Kumar’, had noted that the allegation related to payment of money between the period 2009 to 2016 and the allegation was solely based on the statement of the complainants, without any corroborative material.

¶12

It was also noted that the dispute related to the period

¶13

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/02/2024 at 10:47:28

¶14

starting from the year 2009, whereas the complaint was given for the first time in the year 2018.

¶15

It is not disputed that the applicant has joined investigation and is cooperating with the same.

¶16

In view of the above, in the event of arrest, the applicant is directed to be released on bail on him furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of the like amount subject to the satisfaction of the concerned SHO, on the following conditions:

¶17

a. The applicant shall join and cooperate with the investigation as and when directed by the Investigating Officer;

¶18

b. The applicant shall appear before the learned Trial Court on every date of hearing;

¶19

c. The applicant shall keep the Investigating Officer informed of his current address and mobile contact number, and/or change of residence or mobile details, if any, from time to time;

¶20

d. The applicant shall not tamper with evidence or contact any of witnesses in any manner whatsoever;

¶21

e. The applicant shall not leave the boundaries of the city without informing the concerned Investigating Officer.

¶22

The present application is allowed in the aforesaid terms.

¶23

AMIT MAHAJAN, J

¶24

FEBRUARY 19, 2024 ‘KDK’

¶25

Aditya Kumar v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Aditya Kumar v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nakul Bhardwaj Vs Harsh Bhardwaj Alias Harshita

Umar Farooq @ Farooq Vs State Gnct of Delhi

Harmeet Singh Talwar Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Himanshu Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Ashwani Khatri Vs State Gnct of Delhi

Sushil Kumar Alias Joseph Peter Vs State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.