Disposed

Shahnawaz Alias Shanu v. the State

Delhi HC4 Apr 2024BAIL APPLN./486/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Applicant filed bail application under Cr.P.C. citing alleged influence on prosecution witnesses. Learned S.P.P. noted four public witnesses yet to be examined but submitted liberty to withdraw the application if applicant gets liberty to file again post-examination. Court dismissed application as withdrawn with liberty as prayed.

What did the court decide?

Bail application dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to withdraw and move the same again once other witnesses are examined by the Prosecution.

Shahnawaz Alias Shanu Vs the State — Bail and Remand | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~5

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

+ BAIL APPLN. 486/2022

¶4

SHAHNAWAZ ALIAS SHANU ..... Applicant Through: Mr. Salman Kurshid, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Bilal A. Khan and Ms. Anshu Kapoor, Advocates.

¶5

versus

¶6

THE STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Rajat Nair, SPP with Mr. Dhruv Pandey, Advs. with Insp. Umesh Sati, Crime Branch.

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA O R D E R

¶8

% 04.04.2024 1. This application has been filed under Section 439 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (in short Cr.P.C), praying for the applicant to be released on bail in FIR No.39/2020 registered at Police Station Gokalpuri, Delhi under Sections 147/148/ 149/188/153A/201/427/436/120-B/302/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

¶9

The Learned Special Public Prosecutor for the State, on instructions, submits that there are four important public witnesses who are yet to be examined before the learned Trial Court, namely, Shyam Singh, Anil Pal, Ankit Pal, and Gulshan Singh. He submits that the applicant may influence these witnesses, if released on bail. 3. At this stage, the learned senior counsel for the applicant

¶10

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/04/2024 at 12:28:11

¶11

submits that as far as Ankit Pal is concerned, he has already been examined and discharged.

¶12

He submits that he be given liberty to withdraw the present bail application with liberty to move the same again once the other witnesses are examined by the Prosecution, so as to, in all manner, obviate the objection of the respondent.

¶13

The application is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.

¶14

NAVIN CHAWLA, J

¶15

APRIL 4, 2024/A/am

¶16

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶17

This is a digitally signed order.

¶18

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/04/2024 at 12:28:11

Shahnawaz Alias Shanu v. the State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shahnawaz Alias Shanu v. the State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Karan Chandela Vs State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

Rahul Narang Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Vishal Vs State through SHO Ps Moti Nagar

Jatin Gulrajani Vs State

Sagar Gaur & Ors. Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Khalid Nadim Khan Vs the State (N.C.T. Ofdelhi)