Disposed

Rahul Kumar Gautam v. the State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

Delhi HC3 Apr 2024BAIL APPLN./4320/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Delhi disposed of a bail application withdrawn by the applicant, who was in judicial custody since September 2021. The court directed the Trial Court to expedite the examination of two prosecution witnesses to prevent unnecessary adjournments.

What did the court decide?

Application disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to approach the Court after examination of two material witnesses.

Rahul Kumar Gautam Vs the State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) — Bail and Remand | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~18

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- BAIL APPLN. 4320/2023

¶4

RAHUL KUMAR GAUTAM ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankit Rana, Advocate.

¶5

versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Shubhi Gupta, APP with Inspector Ashutosh Kumar, PS: Aman Vihar, for State.

¶6

CORAM:

¶7

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH

¶8

O R D E R

¶9

% 03.04.2024

¶10

This is an application preferred on behalf of the applicant under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in case FIR No.474/2021 dated 05.09.2021 under Sections 498A/304B/34 IPC registered at PS: Aman Vihar.

¶11

Status Report has been handed over in Court and is taken on record. Ms.Shubhi Gupta, learned APP states that 2 material witnesses remain to be examined on behalf of the prosecution being PW-4/Sumit, brother of the deceased and PW-5/Neha, sister of the deceased.

¶12

Counsel for the applicant, at this stage, seeks to withdraw the application with liberty to approach the Court after examination of the two material witnesses is concluded. He, however, states that the order sheets would substantiate his plea that both the witnesses have not been appearing to give evidence and repeated adjournments are being taken. On the other hand, applicant is suffering as he is in judicial custody since 05.09.2021. In support of the plea, learned counsel hands over copies of the orders sheets of the Trial Court. In this context, it is prayed that directions be issued to the

¶13

BAIL APPLN. 4320/2023 Page 1 of 2

¶14

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/04/2024 at 11:50:24

¶15

Trial Court to expedite recording of evidence of PW-4 and PW-5. 4. Application is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to the applicant to approach the Court after the evidence of PW-4 and PW-5 is concluded. 5. Perusal of the order sheets does reflect that both witnesses have taken repeated adjournments on one pretext or the other. Learned Trial Court is requested to expedite recording of evidence of the aforementioned witnesses and ensure that no unnecessary adjournments are given.

¶16

JYOTI SINGH, J

¶17

APRIL 3, 2024 B.S. Rohella

¶18

BAIL APPLN. 4320/2023 Page 2 of 2

¶19

This is a digitally signed order.

¶20

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/04/2024 at 11:50:24

Rahul Kumar Gautam v. the State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rahul Kumar Gautam v. the State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amit Kumar Vs the State NCT of Delhi

Arun Dabas Vs State Gnct of Delhi and Ors.

Shivam Kumar Rana Vs State

Sachin@Satoo Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Neeraj @ Kala Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi

Divesh Taneja Vs State Govt of NCT of Delhi through SHO Ps Connaught Place New Delhi