Dismissed
Monu v. State
Delhi HCBAIL APPLN./427/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitioner sought withdrawal of bail prayer in an application under Sections 439 and 482 Cr.P.C. While drawing up the notice under Section 54 Arms Act.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~2
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 427/2024 MONU .....Petitioner Through: Ms.Dolly Sharma, Advocate versus STATE .....Respondent Through: Ms.Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for State with Mr.Jatin Raheja, Mr.Nikhil Malhotra, Mr.Pushkar Khatana, Mr.Vishal Tanwar, Mr.Nitin Soni, Mr.Ashok Hooda, Mr.Akash Khatri and Mr.S. Nanda, Advocates with SI Vijay Kumar, P.S. Jaitpur.
¶3
CORAM:
¶4
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA O R D E R % 01.08.2024
¶5
- Application under Section 439 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (‘Cr.P.C.’) has been preferred on behalf of the petitioner for grant of regular bail in FIR No. 265/2016 under Section 302 IPC and Sections 25/27/54/59 of Arms Act registered at PS: Jaitpur, Delhi.
¶6
- Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks to withdraw the application for bail without prejudice to the rights and contentions of petitioner.
¶7
- Taking the statement of learned counsel for the petitioner on record, application is accordingly disposed of. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
¶8
ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J.
¶9
AUGUST 01, 2024/v
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Monu
- respondent
State
Coram
AI extract
Anoop Kumar Mendiratta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court