Bail applications by two petitioners were disposed of as infructuous in view of the court's judgment in connected criminal appeals preferred by the same petitioners; pending applications were also disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~68 & 69
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA O R D E R % 12.02.2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 16:36:44
BAIL APPLN. 381/2024 BAIL APPLN. 382/2024 & CRL. M.A. 3295/2024
In view of judgment passed in CRL.A.132/2024 & CRL.A.131/2024 preferred on behalf of the petitioners herein, no separate orders are required to be passed in the present bail applications and are disposed of as infructuous. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J
FEBRUARY 12, 2024/ sd
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 16:36:44
Priyanka Arora
State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
Kapil Dev Arora
Anoop Kumar Mendiratta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
