Ashok Kumar Yadav v. State of Delhi
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a single-line order on an office note regarding a bail extension application. The Court noted the filing and observed that no orders are required.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~119
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- BAIL APPLN. 3328/2024
ASHOK KUMAR YADAV .....Petitioner Through: None
versus
STATE OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Vikram Singh, APP for the State
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN
O R D E R % 03.10.2024
The matter is listed on office note. The petitioner has already filed an application seeking extension of interim bail. No orders are required to be passed in the present office note.
AMIT MAHAJAN, J
OCTOBER 3, 2024/ PU
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/10/2024 at 10:44:32
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
ASHOK KUMAR YADAV
- respondent
STATE OF DELHI
Coram
Amit Mahajan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court