Interim bail application under Section 439 CrPC in a POCSO and IPC case; no counsel appeared to argue it, so the court deemed the application withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~6
ARUN KUMAR ..... Petitioner
Through: None
versus
STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP for the State with SI Ankita Singh, P.S. Pul Prahladpur, Delhi
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
O R D E R
% 23.01.2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 00:39:50
stated that as far as the present interim bail application is concerned, he is not the counsel for the petitioner neither he is inclined to address arguments on the application for grant of interim bail.
SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J
JANUARY 23, 2024/ns
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 00:39:50
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Arun Kumar
State (GNCT of Delhi)
Swarana Kanta Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
