Allowed

Sandeep Singh v. State through SHO & Anr.

Delhi HC3 Oct 2024BAIL APPLN./3222/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Delhi High Court allowed a bail application under Section 483 BNSS. The court granted court bail to the petitioner on a personal bond with a surety, considering the parties' intention to continue their relationship and the long trial duration, alongside imposing standard conduct and movement restrictions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner admitted to Court bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 20,000 with one surety of the like amount, subject to conditions regarding communication, location, and inducements.

Sandeep Singh Vs State through SHO & Anr. — Bail and Remand | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~5

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

BAIL APPLN. 3222/2024 SANDEEP SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. R. K. Rathore, Mr. Aayush Rathore, Mr. Jagdeep Vats, Mr.Kashish Vats, Advs. versus

¶4

STATE THROUGH SHO & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Ms. Kiran Bairwa, APP for the State with SI Sandeep Singh, PSI Savita, PS Kishangarh Mr. Himanshu Mehra, Adv. for complainant.

¶5

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA

¶6

O R D E R

¶7

% 03.10.2024

¶8

The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS seeking regular bail in case FIR No. 196/2024 under Section 332(2)/74/75/79/115(2)/351(2) BNS registered at PS Kishangarh, Delhi.

¶9

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner and the complainant were known to each other and were thinking of marrying each other. Learned counsel further submits that though the petitioner and the complainant were married earlier, their respective marriages‟ have come to an end. Learned counsel submits that on account of some misunderstanding, the unfortunate incident has happened. It has further been submitted that the chargesheet has already been filed and

¶10

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/10/2024 at 11:45:24

¶11

trial may take a long time.

¶12

Learned APP for the State has strongly opposed the bail application. The learned APP submits that the allegations made in the FIR are very serious in nature which has duly been confirmed by the prosecutrix in her statement under Section 164 Cr.PC. Learned APP for the State submits that allegedly, the petitioner trespassed the house of the complainant and gave merciless beatings and also outraged her modesty. Learned APP states that her friend Annu was also beaten along with the victim.

¶13

The complainant is present alongwith her friend Annu. The complainant states that she is in a relationship for more than one year with the petitioner. The complainant also states that the she wants to continue her relationship with the petitioner. Since the charge sheet has already been filed and the trial may take long time and taking into the contentions of the complainant before the Court, let the petitioner be admitted to Court bail on furnishing of a personal bond in the sum of Rs.20,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned Trial Court with the following conditions;

¶14

a. The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case;

¶15

b. The petitioner shall provide his/her mobile number(s) to the Investigating Officer and keep it operational at all times;

¶16

c. The petitioner shall remain available on the given address at the time of furnishing bail bond and shall not leave NCT of Delhi without the permission of the learned Trial Court.

¶17

¶18

d. In case of change of residential address and/or mobile number, the appellant shall intimate the same to the Investigating Officer/ Court concerned by way of an affidavit.

¶19

In view of the above, the present petition stands disposed of.

¶20

DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J

¶21

OCTOBER 3, 2024 Pallavi /KR

¶22

Sandeep Singh v. State through SHO & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sandeep Singh v. State through SHO & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Akash Vs State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Pankaj Kumar Vs State NCT of Delhi

Reliance Commercial Finance Limited Vs Taraashna Financial Services Limited

Kishan Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Smt Sunita Devi Vs the State Gnct of Delhi

Praveen Kumar & Ors. Vs State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.