Disposed

Rahul Gupta @ Tyagi v. State NCT of Delhi

Delhi HC29 Aug 2024BAIL APPLN./3037/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Undertrial sought 15 days interim bail to attend his mother's Tehrvi rituals. Interim bail was refused due to the State's objection of a subsequent FIR and unsatisfactory jail conduct, but the court permitted the applicant to be taken in police custody in plain clothes to attend the rituals for one day.

What did the court decide?

Applicant to be taken in police custody in plain clothes from Central Jail No. 8 & 9, Tihar to attend rituals at Karol Bagh from 8:00 am to 4:00 pm on 30.08.2024; interim bail refused.

Rahul Gupta @ Tyagi Vs State NCT of Delhi — Bail and Remand | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~67

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- BAIL APPLN. 3037/2024 & CRL.M.A. 25523/2024

¶4

RAHUL GUPTA @ TYAGI .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Vineet Jain, Advocate.

¶6

versus

¶7

STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Laksh Khanna, APP for State

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI O R D E R

¶9

% 29.08.2024

¶10

By way of the present application, the applicant seeks interim bail for a period of 15 days in FIR No. 210/2018 registered under Sections 302/34 IPC and Sections 25/27/54/59 of the Arms Act at P.S. Prasad Nagar, Delhi on the ground of the applicant’s mother’s demise on 18.08.2024 and the applicant, being the son, is required to attend the rituals, including Tehrvi , which is scheduled for tomorrow.

¶11

Issue notice.

¶12

Learned APP for the State accepts the notice.

¶13

The factum of death of the applicant’s mother already stands verified and a Status Report/Verification Report has already been placed before the Ld. Sessions Court.

¶14

Ld. counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant was twice released on interim bail earlier.

¶15

The bail application is opposed by learned APP for the State by contending that after being released, the applicant has been involved in

¶16

This is a digitally signed order.

¶17

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/08/2024 at 12:50:05

¶18

another FIR. It is also submitted that the conduct of applicant in jail is also stated to be unsatisfactory.

¶19

Considering the aforesaid submissions of the Ld. APP, this Court is not inclined to release the applicant on interim bail, however, considering that the factum of death of the applicant’s mother stands verified, the applicant is directed to be taken in police custody in plain clothes from Central Jail No. 8 & 9, Tihar to Raj Vatika, 876 East Park Road, Karol Bagh, near Ajmal Khan Park, New Delhi-110005 from 8:00 am to 4:00 pm on 30.08.2024 and brought back on the same day.

¶20

Bail application is disposed of in the above terms alongwith pending application.

¶21

A copy of this order be communicated to the concerned Jail Superintendent for information and necessary compliance.

¶22

MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J

¶23

AUGUST 29, 2024 akc

¶24

This is a digitally signed order.

¶25

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/08/2024 at 12:50:05

Rahul Gupta @ Tyagi v. State NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rahul Gupta @ Tyagi v. State NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ravinder & Ors. Vs the State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Raja Ram Vs State NCT Delhi & Anr.

Sumit Vs State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

Ranjeet Naik Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Ram Singh Vs State

Dinesh Vs Rajender Kumar