Single-judge order dismissing multiple bail applications as infructuous because the court had already quashed the underlying FIR in a concurrent writ petition on the same day.
The bail applications were dismissed as infructuous due to the quashing of the underlying FIR in a separate petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~6, 7, 8 & 10
*** IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI**
Present: Mr. Ramesh Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Shailendra Singh, Mr. Ishaan Jain and Mr. Harsh Choudhary, Advs. for petitioners in Item Nos. 6,7,8 and 10.
Petitioners in person in Item No. 6, 7, 8 and 10.
Mr. Pradeep Gahalot, APP for the State with SI Manish Tyagi, PS Jamia Nagar in Item Nos. 6,7,8 and 10.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN O R D E R % 14.02.2024
order passed by this Court today in W.P.(CRL) 1471/2020.
AMIT MAHAJAN, J
FEBRUARY 14, 2024 ‘KDK’
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/12/2024 at 15:21:25
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail applications under Section 438 CrPC should be allowed when the underlying FIR has been quashed in a separate petition.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioners
State
Amit Mahajan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
