Disposed

Hari Kishore Prasad @ Kunal v. State of NCT of Delhi

Delhi HC16 Aug 2024BAIL APPLN./2664/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Order regarding pending bail application where the petitioner failed to surrender after interim bail expired. The petitioner and his surety (wife) were untraceable. The court directed the issuance of fresh non-bailable warrants, further efforts by the IO to serve the petitioner, and a status report on compliance with interim bail conditions.

What the court decided

AI extract

Hari Kishore Prasad @ Kunal Vs State of NCT of Delhi — Bail and Remand | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~59

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- BAIL APPLN. 2664/2024

¶4

HARI KISHORE PRASAD @ KUNAL .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Arjun Malik, Advocate.

¶6

versus

¶7

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Utkarsh, APP for the State with Inspector Mintu Singh, P.S.: S.P. Badli.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI

¶10

O R D E R % 03.10.2024

¶11

This matter has been listed on office note dated 03.10.2024, informing the court that the service of Non-Bailable Warrants (‘NBWs’) upon the petitioner, who had failed to surrender upon expiration of his interim bail, is awaited. Though the office note says that notice to the surety has been served through the Investigating Officer (‘IO’), Mr. Utkarsh, learned APP appearing for the State submits, that as per his instructions, the surety has also not been served.

¶12

The surety was the petitioner’s wife; and it appears that both are not available at their last known address.

¶13

The IO is not present in court today. Learned APP submits, that as per oral instructions received, the petitioner is not traceable and the surety is also not present.

¶14

BAIL APPLN. 2664/2024 Page 1 of 2

¶15

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/10/2024 at 16:37:03

¶16

Mr. Arjun Malik, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits, that he was appointed by Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee to represent the petitioner; and that the petitioner has not been in contact with him either.

¶17

In the circumstances, let fresh NBWs be issued against the petitioner, returnable for the next date of hearing.

¶18

The IO is directed to exercise further efforts to serve the petitioner; and to ensure that the surety is present in court on the next date.

¶19

Let a status report be also filed clarifying whether the petitioner had at all complied with the conditions contained in paras 8.3 and 8.4 of order dated 16.08.2024, whereby the petitioner was granted interim bail.

¶20

The IO is directed to remain present in court on the next date of hearing.

¶21

Re-notify on 14^th October 2024.

¶22

ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J

¶23

OCTOBER 3, 2024/ ak

¶24

BAIL APPLN. 2664/2024 Page 2 of 2

¶25

This is a digitally signed order.

¶26

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/10/2024 at 16:37:03

Hari Kishore Prasad @ Kunal v. State of NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Hari Kishore Prasad @ Kunal v. State of NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prempal Vs State NCT of Delhi

Tejashvari Devi Vs State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

Prince Bharti Vs the State NCT of Delhi

M. Radha Vs State Govt of NCT of Delhi

Nirbhay Kumar Shrivastava & Ors. Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Sonu @ Refar @ Sadre Alam Vs State NCT of Delhi and Anr.