Allowed

Himanshu Rastogi v. State N.C.T. of Delhi

Delhi HC14 Oct 2024BAIL APPLN./2379/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court disposed of two anticipatory bail petitions filed by Himanshu Rastogi and Rishi Chhabra. Granting bail subject to joining the investigation, providing requisitioned documents/devices, and not influencing witnesses, with a bond of Rs. 50,000 each.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail on plea of Rs. 50,000 each with one surety, subject to joining investigation and producing requisitioned items.

Himanshu Rastogi Vs State N.C.T. of Delhi — Cheque Dishonour | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~6 & 7

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

BAIL APPLN. 2379/2024 HIMANSHU RASTOGI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kaushal Yadav, Mr. R K Singh, Ms. Priyanka Singh, Advocates

¶4

versus

¶5

STATE N.C.T. OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State with Ms. Shehnaz Khan, Adv. Insp. Sanjay Singh PS EOW Mandir Marg Mr. Rajesh Gupta & Mr. Manan Gupta, Advs. for complainant i.e ICICI Bank Ltd.

¶6

¶7

BAIL APPLN. 2571/2024 RISHI CHHABRA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Jaydip Pati, Mr. Mohit Chawla and Mr. Ankit Tyagi, Advs.

¶8

versus

¶9

THE STATE OF NCT DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State with Ms. Shehnaz Khan, Adv. Insp. Sanjay Singh PS EOW Mandir Marg Mr. Rajesh Gupta & Mr. Manan Gupta, Adv. for complainant i.e ICICI Bank Ltd.

¶10

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL O R D E R % 14.10.2024

¶11

These petitions have been filed seeking anticipatory bail in FIR No.65/2022 at P.S. EOW, Mandir Marg under Sections

¶12

This is a digitally signed order.

¶13

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/10/2024 at 11:40:27

¶14

409/420/468/471/120B IPC. Petitioners were granted interim protection by order dated 11^th July 2024 in the facts and circumstances as noted therein. Thereafter investigation continued.

¶15

According to petitioner’s counsel, they provided all documents, mobile phones, whatsapp chats etc. to the IO which is refuted by the APP who states that the mobile phone which was provided to the IO was in damaged condition and no other device has been provided to the IO.

¶16

Counsel for the petitioner further states that petitioner is willing to join and cooperate in the investigation and will provide mobile phone/ devices, money trails and documents, which may be requisitioned by the IO.

¶17

It is further noted that charge-sheet against co-accused Anshul Ahuja, Credit Manager, ICICI Bank has already been filed and charges have been framed. APP for the State further submits that supplementary charge-sheet is to be filed with respect to present petitioners.

¶18

Accordingly, subject to petitioners joining and cooperating in investigation and providing what is requisitioned by the IO, in the event of arrest the petitioners, they be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- each with one surety each of the like amount subject to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/IO/SHO concerned, further subject to the condition that the petitioners will join investigation as and when directed and not influence any witness/complainant/victim or tamper with evidence of the case.

¶19

Accordingly, both these petitions are disposed of. Pending applications (if any) are disposed of as infructuous.

¶20

Order be uploaded on the website of this Court.

¶21

ANISH DAYAL, J

¶22

OCTOBER 14, 2024/sm

¶23

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/10/2024 at 11:40:27

Himanshu Rastogi v. State N.C.T. of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Himanshu Rastogi v. State N.C.T. of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Savita & Ors. Vs Ravi Vaid

Lalit Kumar Vs State & Anr.

Suresh Negi Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Ravi Kapoor Vs State & Ors.

Hitesh Pratap Singh Chauhan Vs State NCT of Delhi

Sandeep@Deepu Vs State of NCT of Delhi