Akshay v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court allowed the petitioner's application for anticipatory bail in an FIR registered under Sections 308 and 34 IPC, noting that the injuries were simple in nature and the petitioner had cooperated with the investigation.
What did the court decide?
Anticipatory bail granted subject to executing personal bond of Rs. 25,000/- with one surety of like amount, cooperating with investigation, and not influencing witnesses.
What the court decided
$~15
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- BAIL APPLN. 234/2024
AKSHAY .....Petitioner
Through: Mr Sanjeev Sehgal, Ms Sunita, Mr Harshit, Mr Harshvardhan and MsAnshu, Advocates
versus STATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Aman Usman, APP for State with Mr. Aman Jett Juneja, Ms. Shruti Sharma, Mr. Gaurav Sharma and Mr. Ankit Tirpathi, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL
O R D E R
% 18.07.2024
- This petition has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in FIR no. 597/2023 registered at PS Sarita Vihar, under Sections 308/34 IPC.
- This Court on 19th January, 2024,while issuing notice in the application granted interim protection to the petitioner against arrest; the background facts and circumstances are stated in the said order.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail in FIR no. 597/2023 under Sections 308/34 IPC?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
AKSHAY
- respondent
STATE
Coram
ANISH DAYAL
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court