Allowed

Tejal Patel v. State and Anr.

Delhi HC15 Jan 2024BAIL APPLN./2076/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC in an FIR punishable under Sections 420, 406, 34 IPC. Court granted bail upon amicable settlement and confirmed custody not required.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted subject to personal bond of Rs.25,000/- with surety in Rs.25,000/- and four specific conditions regarding investigation, movement, contacting complainant, and communication details.

Tejal Patel Vs State and Anr. — Delhi HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~5

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

BAIL APPLN. 2076/2023 TEJAL PATEL ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Hemlata & Ms. Seema Sehrawat, Advs.

¶4

versus

¶5

STATE AND ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Aman Usman, APP with SI Mohit Kumar, PS Connaught Place. Mr.N.K. Aggarwal, Ms.Sanjana Antil, Mr.Nupur Sachdeva, Ms.Amanpreeet Kaur, Advs. for complainant

¶6

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA O R D E R

¶7

% 15.01.2024

¶8

This application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short, ‘CrPC’), praying for grant of Anticipatory Bail in FIR No. 0038/2021, registered with Police Station: Connaught Place, New Delhi District, Delhi, under Sections 420/406/34 Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short, ‘IPC’).

¶9

The learned counsel for the applicant and the complainant submits that the parties have amicably settled their disputes.

¶10

The learned APP also, on instructions from the Investigating Officer (IO), submits that the custodial interrogation of the applicant is not required.

¶11

In view of the above, in case of arrest of the applicant in FIR

¶12

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/05/2024 at 12:14:55

¶13

No. 0038/2021 registered with Police Station: Connaught Place, New Delhi District, Delhi, under Sections 420/406/34 IPC, the applicant be released on bail, subject to furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one local surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the IO/Arresting Officer/Station House Officer (SHO) concerned, and further subject to the following conditions:

¶14

(i) that the applicant will join investigation as and when directed, in writing;

¶15

(ii) that the applicant shall not leave NCT of Delhi without intimating the IO/SHO concerned;

¶16

(iii) that the applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, try to contact/influence the complainant/victim or any other witness(s) or tamper with evidence of the case; and,

¶17

(iv) that the applicant shall furnish his mobile phone/landline number and residential address to the IO/SHO concerned and shall keep his mobile/landline phones operational at all times during this period, and in the event of any change of the same, will immediately inform the same to the IO/SHO.

¶18

The Bail Application is disposed of in the above terms.

¶19

NAVIN CHAWLA, J

¶20

JANUARY 15, 2024/ rv/ss

¶21

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶22

This is a digitally signed order.

¶23

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/05/2024 at 12:14:55

Tejal Patel v. State and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tejal Patel v. State and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jeevesh Sabharwal & Anr. Vs Maharaj Krishen Pandita

Pallav Sharma Vs the State of Delhi (Nct) and Anr.

Jay Singh & Anr. Vs the State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Sanjeev Rathore @ Sanjeev Kumar Vs State Ofnct Delhi & Anr.

Vivek Prasad & Ors. Vs the State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Rahul Singh @ Anant Vs State (Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi)