Bail modification application under Section 528 BNSS sought deletion of the reporting-to-IO condition in a 2024 bail order. ED did not contest; the Court deleted condition (e) but cautioned against repeated modification applications and disposed of the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~54
versus
DIRECTORATE OFENFORCEMENT GOVERNMENT OFINDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. D.P Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Manu Mishra, Mr Imaan khera and Ms. Garima Saxena, Advocates
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
CRL.M.A. 32674/2025
CRL.M.A. 32673/2025(corrections/modifications of orders)
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/11/2025 at 15:03:54
dated 28.01.2025 whereby this condition was deleted on account of Applicant being in the judicial custody in another case in Gurgaon
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
NOVEMBER 6, 2025 N
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/11/2025 at 15:03:54
1 issue framed by the court
Should condition (e) of the bail order dated 17.09.2024 requiring periodic reporting to the IO be deleted?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Amit Katyal
Directorate of Enforcement Government of India
Neena Bansal Krishna
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
