Dismissed

Salman @ Monu v. State Govt.of NCT of Delhi

Delhi HC4 Oct 2024BAIL APPLN./1763/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application in a murder case pending charge-framing for four and a half years after arrest; petitioner sought withdrawal, which was allowed, with a direction to the trial court to conclude arguments on charge within two weeks.

What did the court decide?

Bail application permitted to be withdrawn and dismissed as withdrawn; trial court directed to conclude charge arguments by next date or within two weeks.

Salman @ Monu Vs State Govt.of NCT of Delhi — Bail and Remand | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- BAIL APPLN. 1763/2024

¶4

SALMAN @ MONU .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Yugant Kuhar and Mr. Tejas Singh, Advocates.

¶6

versus

¶7

STATE GOVT.OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Laksh Khanna, APP for State with SI Ravinder Chander PS Amar Colony, Delhi.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI O R D E R

¶10

% 04.10.2024

¶11

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner was arrested on 07.03.2020 and the matter is still at the stage of framing of charge and the next date before the Trial Court is 24.10.2024.

¶12

Learned APP for the state submits that the prosecution has cited two eye witnesses including the brother of the deceased and an auto driver. It is also stated by learned APP that the co-accused Deepak Pandit has already been declared a proclaimed offender.

¶13

After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present bail application at this stage as charge is yet not framed.

¶14

In view of the above, the bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. However, at the same time, considering the fact that four and a half years have passed since the arrest of the applicant, the Trial Court shall make an

¶15

This is a digitally signed order.

¶16

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/10/2024 at 14:37:50

¶17

endeavour to proceed with the arguments on charge and conclude the same on the next date of hearing i.e. on 24.10.2024 and/or within two weeks thereafter. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he will not seek any adjournment before the Trial Court.

¶18

Let a copy of this order be communicated to the Trial Court for necessary action.

¶19

MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J

¶20

OCTOBER 4, 2024/ rd

¶21

This is a digitally signed order.

¶22

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/10/2024 at 14:37:50

Salman @ Monu v. State Govt.of NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Salman @ Monu v. State Govt.of NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sh Darshan Kumar @Bhallu Vs State of Govt of NCT of Delhi through SHO

Himanshu@Sagar@Baba Vs the State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

Prem Chand Vs Nisha

Mahender Pal Chauhan & Anr. Vs State & Anr.

Promila Chhabra Vs Manish Malhotra

Nirmal Santra Vs Delhi Police & Ors.