Dismissed

Shri Ram @ Pappu v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Delhi HC10 May 2024BAIL APPLN./1665/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail exemption application, the petitioner sought extension of interim bail for medical treatment. The application was withdrawn by counsel with a prayer to move a fresh application before the Trial Court. The court dismissed the application as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

The bail exemption application was dismissed as withdrawn along with any pending applications.

Shri Ram @ Pappu Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr. — Bail and Remand | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~59

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

BAIL APPLN. 1665/2024, CRL.M.A. 14483/2024

¶4

(Exemption) & CRL.M.A. 14482/2024 (Exemption)

¶5

SHRI RAM @ PAPPU ..... Petitioner

¶6

Through: Mr. Pankaj Sinha, Mr. Rustam Kuraishi & Mr. Deepak Mishra, Advocates.

¶7

versus

¶8

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the State with Insp. Manoj Kumar, P.S. Mahendra Park.

¶9

CORAM:

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA

¶11

O R D E R % 10.05.2024

¶12

The present application under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. seeks the following prayers:

¶13

“1. Grant the extension of interim bail upto the date of his discharge from Nayak Jai Parkash Hospital, Delhi Gate, New Delhi where his date of admission is 14.06.2024 and Operation on 16.06.2024 for Multiple Incisional Hernia and date of admission in Maulana Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi on 27.06.2024 and operation thereafter and for other treatment and surgeries as stated above, in the meanwhile, in the interests of justice and;

¶14

Any further and/or such other relief(s) deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, may also be passed / granted to the petitioner / accused.”

¶15

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant seeks leave to withdraw the present application with a prayer that after surrendering before

¶16

This is a digitally signed order.

¶17

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/05/2024 at 11:38:58

¶18

the jail authorities, the applicant may be permitted to move a fresh application before the learned Trial Court and the same may be decided in accordance with law.

¶19

The present application is dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of accordingly.

¶20

Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

¶21

Needless to state that, if an application for interim bail is moved on behalf of the applicant before the learned Trial Court, the same shall be decided in accordance with law.

¶22

AMIT SHARMA, J

¶23

MAY 10, 2024/bsr

¶24

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶25

This is a digitally signed order.

¶26

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/05/2024 at 11:38:58

Shri Ram @ Pappu v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri Ram @ Pappu v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nikhil Sharma Vs State(Govt of NCT of Delhi)

Sidharth Sharma Vs State

Kesari Tour Private Limited Vs the State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Dr Ashish Kumar Soin Vs Union of India

Shashim Das Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Nitish Gakhar and Others Vs State of NCT Delhi and Another