Disposed

Amitkumar v. the State (Nct of Delhi)

Delhi HC12 Jan 2024BAIL APPLN./1609/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Three petitioners in a cross-case arising from an incident of 10.04.2023 sought bail in FIR No. 251/2023. Interim protection had been granted subject to joining investigation. Having complied and the Investigating Officer confirming they were no longer required, the Court directed release on bail on arrest.

What did the court decide?

Conditional bail on arrest: personal bond Rs. 25,000 each plus surety, satisfaction of IO/Arresting Officer, subject to joining investigation as directed

Amitkumar Vs the State (Nct of Delhi) — Quashing and FIR | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~10 - 12

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- BAIL APPLN. 1609/2023

¶4

AMITKUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mohd. Shariq, Adv. versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Aashneet Singh, APP for State with SI Abhishek Police Station Harsh Vihar 11. + BAIL APPLN. 1616/2023 MANOJ ..... Petitioner Through: Mohd. Shariq, Adv. versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Aashneet Singh, APP for State with SI Abhishek Police Station Harsh Vihar 12. + BAIL APPLN. 1620/2023 ROHIT @ MONU ..... Petitioner Through: Mohd. Shariq, Adv. versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Aashneet Singh, APP for State with SI Abhishek Police Station Harsh Vihar

¶5

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/05/2024 at 12:14:40

¶6

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN

¶7

¶8

O R D E R 12.01.2024

¶9

Vide order dated 16.05.2023, this Court had noted the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner that an FIR was also registered at the instance of one of the petitioners, namely, Amit (petitioner in BAIL APPLN. 1609/2023) which contains all bailable offences despite Manoj (brother of Amit) having suffered a fracture, which creates a serious doubt about the genesis of the incident dated 10.04.2023 as projected by the prosecution in present FIR No. 251/2023 as well as with regard to the overt acts committed by the complainant and her husband.

¶10

Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, interim protection was granted to the petitioners subject to their joining investigation.

¶11

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioners have joined the investigation as and when required by the Investigating Officer, which position is not disputed by the learned APP, on the instructions from the Investigating Officer, who is present in Court. The learned APP further apprises the Court that the petitioners are no more required for any further investigation.

¶12

In view of the above, it is directed that in the event of petitioners being arrested, they be released on bail subject to their furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- each and a surety bond of the like amount to

¶13

This is a digitally signed order.

¶14

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/05/2024 at 12:14:40

¶15

the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer / Arresting Officer subject to further condition that they will join investigation as and when directed by the IO concerned.

¶16

The petition stands disposed of.

¶17

Order be uploaded on the website of this Court.

¶18

VIKAS MAHAJAN, J

¶19

JANUARY 12, 2024 N.S. ASWAL

¶20

This is a digitally signed order.

¶21

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/05/2024 at 12:14:40

Amitkumar v. the State (Nct of Delhi)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amitkumar v. the State (Nct of Delhi)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Xyz Vs the State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Mohd Anamul Vs State NCT Govt. of Delhi and Ors.

Vishal @ Dadhi Vs State Gnctd

Jaideep Singh Kalra Vs State and Anr.

Suresh Kakkar Vs State Govt of NCT of Delhi

Mohd Wasim Vs State NCT of Delhi