Dismissed

Adil Khan v. the State

Delhi HC18 Oct 2024BAIL APPLN./1305/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail applications and a contempt petition were sought to be withdrawn with liberty to file fresh anticipatory bail before the Sessions Court. The court dismissed the petitions as withdrawn without examining merits and directed filing of the fresh application the next day.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to file fresh anticipatory bail application before the Sessions Court, to be filed the next day; no merits decided.

Adil Khan Vs the State — Anticipatory Bail | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~67 to 69

¶2

*	IN THE HIGH COURT O	F DELHI AT NEW DELHI
67 +	BAIL APPLN. 1277/2024 JUBER KHAN Through: versus	.....Petitioner Mr. Maninder Singh, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Sanjan Nair, Ms. Hinu Mahajan, Mr. Aditya Srivastava, Advs.
	THE STATE Through:	.....Respondent Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, ASC, Ms. Charu Sharma, Mr. Arjit Sharma, Mr. Vaibhav Vats, Mr. Nikunj Bindal, Advs. for State and IO SI Ramesh Yadav, PS Cyber/SWD.
68 +	BAIL APPLN. 1305/2024 ADIL KHAN Through: versus	.....Petitioner Mr. Maninder Singh, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Sanjan Nair, Ms. Hinu Mahajan, Mr. Aditya Srivastava, Advs.
	THE STATE	.....Respondent
	Through:	Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, ASC, Ms. Charu Sharma, Mr. Arjit Sharma, Mr. Vaibhav Vats, Mr. Nikunj Bindal, Advs. for State and IO SI Ramesh Yadav, PS Cyber/SWD.
69
+	CONT.CAS(C) 1357/2024, C JUBER KHAN	M APPL. 49506/2024 .....Petitioner

¶3

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 02:05:32

¶4

Through: Mr. Maninder Singh, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Sanjan Nair, Ms. Hinu Mahajan, Mr. Aditya Srivastava, Advs.

¶5

versus

¶6

SI RAMESH YADAV .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, ASC, Ms. Charu Sharma, Mr. Arjit Sharma, Mr. Vaibhav Vats, Mr. Nikunj Bindal, Advs. for State and IO SI Ramesh Yadav, PS Cyber/SWD.

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA

¶8

O R D E R % 18.10.2024

¶9

At the outset, Sh. Maninder Singh, learned senior counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present bail applications and contempt petition with liberty to file a fresh anticipatory bail application before the Ld. Sessions Court.

¶10

Sh. Sanjeev Bhandari, learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State submits that the petitioner may withdraw the anticipatory bail application. However, interim protection may not be extended.

¶11

In view of the submissions of the learned senior counsel for the petitioner, the present petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. Let the fresh anticipatory bail application be filed before the Ld. Sessions Court. Ld. Sessions Court shall decide the same in accordance with law and taking into account the subsequent investigation conducted by the police and the affidavit filed by the petitioner before this Court.

¶12

The petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. However learned senior

¶13

¶14

counsel for the petitioner shall file the anticipatory bail application tomorrow itself before the Ld. Sessions Court.

¶15

It is made clear that this court has not gone into the merits of the case and no expression made herein shall tantamount to be an expression on the merits of the case.

¶16

DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J

¶17

OCTOBER 18, 2024/AR/SM..

¶18

Adil Khan v. the State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Adil Khan v. the State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajesh Breja Vs the State NCT of Delhi

Riya & Anr. Vs State NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Smt. Neelam Mittal & Anr. Vs Smt. Sakshi Dua

Juber Khan Vs the State

Suresh Kumar Gupta Vs State of Delhi

Ajmal Hussain Vs State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi),Though SHO P.S. Special Cell