Pankaj v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application for medical examination disposed of. The court noted that the MRI brain had been conducted and the MRI shoulder was scheduled. Directed sharing of reports and evaluation at jail hospital if needed.
What did the court decide?
Disposed of with directions to share MRI reports and ensure evaluation at jail dispensary or referral hospital if required.
What the court decided
$~107
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- BAIL APPLN. 1243/2024 PANKAJ ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Dolly Sharma, Advocate.
- versus
- STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Aashneet Singh, APP for State alongwith Inspector Bhanu Pratap P.S. Shalimar Bagh.
CORAM:
- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI O R D E R
- % 24.05.2024
- Learned APP for the State, on instructions, states that petitioner’s/applicant’s MRI brain has already been conducted and MRI Shoulder is now scheduled for 27.05.2024.
- Considering that applicant’s grievance of being accorded a long date for the aforesaid examination has already been addressed, the petition is disposed of with the direction that the reports of the MRI be shared with the applicant and in case required, the applicant be also evaluated in the jail dispensary or referral hospital.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Pankaj
- respondent
State
Coram
Manoj Kumar Ohri
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court