Dismissed

Shadab v. the State NCT of Delhi

Delhi HC4 Nov 2024BAIL APPLN./1234/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought bail. Petitioner requested withdrawal of the petition following the Court's direction to complete the trial within a month. The Court dismissed the withdrawal petition with liberty to approach the Court if the trial is unnecessarily prolonged.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn. Liberty granted to approach the Court if the trial is unnecessarily prolonged.

Shadab Vs the State NCT of Delhi — Bail and Remand | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~4

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- BAIL APPLN. 1234/2024

¶4

SHADAB .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Mohd. Aakil and Mr. Danish Ahmed, Advocates.

¶6

versus

¶7

THE STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Hemant Mehla, APP for State with Insp. Sudhir Rathi, ATO P.S. Shakar Pur and Insp. Sanjeev Sharma, T.I, Rohini Circle.

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL O R D E R

¶9

% 04.11.2024

¶10

Pursuant to the directions passed by this Court on 08^th August 2024, it is informed by the APP for the State, on instructions, that all witnesses have been examined, except for one SI Mahesh, who is on medical leave and is expected to be examined day after tomorrow. It is stated that SI Mahesh will be present to record his testimony before the Trial Court as per date scheduled.

¶11

APP for the State submits that petitioner will be under risk of fleeing if given bail, considering the trial is at the fag end of completion, there is substantial circumstantial evidence against the accused/petitioner including recovery of the key, statement of the neighbours of altercations between him and the deceased, post-mortem report which notes scuffle and abrasions, and application of Section 106 Indian Evidence Act, considering the premises

¶12

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/11/2024 at 11:59:59

¶13

was taken by the petitioner where the deceased was staying.

¶14

In the circumstances, this Court directs that the trial be now completed within a month’s time.

¶15

Counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition at this stage, considering the directions passed by this Court with liberty to approach this Court in case the trial gets unnecessary prolonged.

¶16

Needless to state, the above recordal is for purposes of bail and no view has been expressed on the merits of the matter.

¶17

Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Liberty granted.

¶18

Order be uploaded on the website of this Court.

¶19

ANISH DAYAL, J

¶20

NOVEMBER 4, 2024 /DU/tk

¶21

This is a digitally signed order.

¶22

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/11/2024 at 11:59:59

Shadab v. the State NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shadab v. the State NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Binesh Khatri Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Kamal @ Kake Vs State

Sandeep Singh Padan Vs State of NCT of Delh

Shri Vinay Maloo and Ors. & Ors. Vs State of NCT of Delhi and Anr. & Anr.

Subhash Chand Vs State & Anr.

Mukesh Kumar Karela & Ors. Vs State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.