Allowed

Amet Vikram Chhabra v. State

Delhi HC29 Jan 2024BAIL APPLN./121/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-paragraph bail application order extended the petitioner's interim bail for four weeks. The court verified medical records showing the petitioner's wife required post-operative care after surgery and granted the extension on the same terms as the previous order.

What did the court decide?

Interim bail of the petitioner was extended for a further period of four weeks on the same terms and conditions.

Amet Vikram Chhabra Vs State — Bail and Remand | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~21

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- BAIL APPLN. 121/2024

¶4

AMET VIKRAM CHHABRA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Hirein Sharma and Mr. Vimal Tyagi, Advs.

¶5

versus

¶6

STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Raghuinder Verma, APP for State with Insp. Rajeev Kakkar AHTU/Crime Branch

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN

¶8

O R D E R % 29.01.2024

¶9

The present application has been filed seeking extension of interim bail in case FIR No. 216/2019 under Sections 364/302/201/120B/34 IPC registered at PS Greater Kailash, which was granted to the petitioner vide order dated 12.12.2023.

¶10

The learned counsel for the petitioner has sought further extension of interim bail on the ground that the petitioner’s wife had undergone surgery on 04.01.2024 and the treating doctor has advised post operative care to the petitioner’s wife for six months which requires an attendant.

¶11

The learned counsel submits that apart from the present petitioner, there is no other male member in the family to look after his wife.

¶12

Notice was issued vide order dated 10.01.2024 with a direction to the

¶13

This is a digitally signed order.

¶14

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/07/2024 at 12:41:22

¶15

State to file status report verifying the medical record. The status report has been filed, the same is on record.

¶16

A perusal of the status report reveals that the petitioner’s wife was admitted in the Ekta Hospital on 03.01.2024 where she underwent surgery on 04.01.2023. The medical record has also been verified wherein she has been advised six weeks post operative care.

¶17

In view of the above, the interim bail of the petitioner is extended for further four weeks on the same terms and conditions as mentioned in order dated 12.12.2023.

¶18

The application stands disposed of.

¶19

VIKAS MAHAJAN, J

¶20

JANUARY 29, 2024 N.S. ASWAL

¶21

This is a digitally signed order.

¶22

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/07/2024 at 12:41:22

Amet Vikram Chhabra v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amet Vikram Chhabra v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shashank Singh Vs the State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)

Pradeep Kumar & Anr. Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Dinesh Kumar & Ors. Vs the State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

Sujit Kumar Gautam Vs State Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

Pankaj Kumar Ors. Vs State and Anr.

Mohd Javed Vs the State NCT of Delhi & Anr.