Abbas v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application disposed of after counsel submitted that the accused had already been acquitted by the trial court in the underlying FIR under Sections 376 IPC and 4 of the POCSO Act, rendering the application infructuous.
What the court decided
$~1
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- BAIL APPLN. 1042/2024 ABBAS .....Petitioner
- Through: Mr. Ishan Jain, Adv. (VC)
versus
STATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Raghuinder Verma, APP for the State with SI Rajesh Chauhan, PS Jaitpur
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA O R D E R % 05.09.2024
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused has already been acquitted by the learned Trial Court in case FIR 410/2023 under Section U/S 376 IPC & 4 POCSO Act registered at PS Jaitpur and therefore the present bail application has become infructuous.
In view of the submissions made, the present bail application stands disposed of.
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Abbas
- respondent
State
Coram
Dinesh Kumar Sharma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court