serious doubts in the version of the prosecution. He submits that the chargesheet was filed alleging that the co-accused, Sakil, had made an extra-judicial confession to one witness, namely, Vishal. He submits that the said witness, Vishal, had claimed to be the Contractor in the building where the dead body of the victim was found. It was also alleged by the prosecution that the co-accused, Sakil, at the time of the incident, was working as a Watchman in the said building and had called the witness, Vishal, and confessed about the crime. He submits that the witness, Vishal, during his examination, has not been able to show that he was working as a Contractor in the said building and has further not been able to show that the co-accused, Sakil, at any point of time, was working as a Watchman in the said building.