“26. In the present case, undoubtedly, the respondent being a LLP, liability of partners whereof is limited to their share in the partnership and from the factum of the respondent having no assets, the possibility of the claimant, even if having a monitory award in its favour being not able to recover the monies thereunder from the respondent cannot be ruled out. The claimant thus, out of the 3 ingredients above for grant of interim measures, can be said to satisfy the ingredient of irreparable loss and injury. Having said that, one cannot be at the same time be unmindful of the fact that the claimant chose to do business with the respondent, a LLP, and is deemed to have known of the limits of the liability of the respondent and its partners. I have wondered whether the claimant can now be permitted to cry hoarse, of disadvantage or prejudice caused to it for the reason of the respondent being a LLP. The claimant, at the time of entering into the agreement with the limited liability partnership firm, did not opt to make the partners thereof personally liable for obligations under the contract and even now has not made out a case for piercing of the veil of LLP, as in the case of companies. However, even if the claimant were to be said to satisfy the ingredient of irreparable loss and injury, that alone does not entitle the claimant to the interim measures, which the counsel for the claimant also agreed, are in the nature of
