Disposed

Mahesh Edible Agro Oil Industries Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v. Kalpana Rathore & Ors.

Delhi HC9 Jul 2024ARB. A. (COMM.)/19/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Three appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act challenged an arbitrator's Section 17 interim order in a family dispute. With parties' consent, appeals were disposed of by referring disputes to a freshly appointed arbitrator under DIAC aegis, leaving all rights and contentions open.

What did the court decide?

Disputes referred to arbitration of Justice S. Ravindra Bhat (Retd.) under DIAC rules; all rights and contentions left open.

Mahesh Edible Agro Oil Industries Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. Vs Kalpana… — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~4 to 6

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB. A. (COMM.) 19/2020 & I.As. 8914/2020, 10537/2020, 127/2021. MAHESH EDIBLE AGRO OIL INDUSTRIES PVT LTD & ORS. .....Petitioners versus KALPANA RATHORE & ORS. .....Respondents + ARB. A. (COMM.) 23/2020 & I.As. 9675-77/2020, 15184/2021. MAHESH EDIBLE AGRO OIL INDUSTRIES PVT LTD & ORS. .....Petitioners versus MAHESH EDIBLE OIL INDUSTRIES LIMITED & ORS. .....Respondents + ARB. A. (COMM.) 24/2020 & I.As. 9678-81/2020. MAHESH EDIBLE AGRO OIL INDUSTRIES PVT LTD & ORS. .....Petitioners

¶3

versus

¶4

MAHESH EDIBLE OIL INDUSTRIES LIMITED .....Respondent Appearances:

¶5

Ms. Monika Arora, Mr. Subhrdeep Saha, Advocates for petitioners [9810246300].

¶6

Mr. Rohit Sharma, Mr. Jatin Lalwani, and Mr. Nikhil Purohit, Advocates for respondents.

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

O R D E R

09.07.2024

ARB. A. (COMM.) 19/2020 & connected matters.

¶13

Page 1 of 4

¶14

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 23:40:45

¶15

These three appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [“the Act”], are directed against a common order dated 19.09.2020 passed by a learned sole arbitrator in applications filed by the parties under Section 17 of the Act. 2. The parties are members of the same family and companies belonging to the said family. 3. I have heard Ms. Monika Arora, learned counsel for the appellants, and Mr. Rohit Sharma, learned counsel for the respondents. 4. During the course of hearing, I am informed that a learned Arbitrator was appointed in terms of an order dated 28.05.2020 passed by this Court in CS(COMM) 142/2020. However, after the impugned order dated 19.09.2020 was passed, the learned Arbitrator appointed by this Court has resigned from the proceedings in January 2023.

¶16

The arbitral proceedings have been at a standstill as parties were attempting to settle their disputes in mediation. The mediation proceedings have unfortunately been unsuccessful. 6. In these circumstances, and having regard to the fact that the interim arrangements which were put in place by the order dated 19.09.2020 have held the field for almost four years, I have put it to learned counsel for the parties that the arbitral proceedings ought to be taken to their logical conclusion. Ms. Arora and Mr. Sharma both submit that their clients are agreeable to reconstitution of the arbitral tribunal in these proceedings itself, so that the proceedings can continue, without prejudice to their rights and contentions on maintainability and merits of their respective claims and counter claims.

¶17

ARB. A. (COMM.) 19/2020 & connected matters.

¶18

Page 2 of 4

¶19

¶20

Having regard to the aforesaid submissions, and with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the appeals, alongwith all pending applications, are disposed of with the following directions:

¶21

A. The disputes between the parties are referred to arbitration of Hon’ble Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat, former Judge, Supreme Court of India [Tel: 9818000160].

¶22

B. The arbitration will be held under the aegis of Delhi International Arbitration Centre, Delhi High Court, Shershah Road, New Delhi [“DIAC”] and subject to the Rules of DIAC, including as to remuneration of the learned Arbitrator.

¶23

C. The learned Arbitrator is requested to furnish a declaration under Section 12 of the Act, prior to entering into reference.

¶24

D. The learned Arbitrator is requested to take up the proceedings from the stage after completion of pleadings. The pleadings which were filed before the erstwhile learned Arbitrator, will be placed by the parties before the learned Arbitrator appointed by this Court today.

¶25

E. I am informed that the appellants herein had made an application challenging the jurisdiction of the erstwhile learned Arbitral Tribunal to adjudicate some of the claims of the respondents. Ms. Arora states that she will take instructions as to whether the appellants wish to press that application, and if so, will request the learned Arbitrator to consider that application first.

¶26

F. In the event either party seeks any orders under Section 17 of the Act, they may make an application to the learned Arbitrator for that purpose, which will be considered on its own merits, having regard to all the facts and circumstances of the case.

¶27

ARB. A. (COMM.) 19/2020 & connected matters.

¶28

Page 3 of 4

¶29

¶30

G. Learned counsel for the parties accept that the impugned order dated 19.09.2020 was passed on applications filed by the parties under Section 17 of the Act, and does not constitute a final adjudication on any of the issues discussed herein.

¶31

H. Learned counsel for the parties assure the Court, particularly in view of the long pendency of the disputes, that they will cooperate with the learned Arbitrator for expeditious disposal of the proceedings and no unnecessary adjournments will be sought.

¶32

I. All rights and contentions of the parties are left open for adjudication before the learned Arbitrator.

¶33

It is made clear that this Court has not entered into the merits of the appeals in view of the order passed today with the consent of parties.

¶34

PRATEEK JALAN, J

¶35

JULY 9, 2024 “Bhupi”/

¶36

ARB. A. (COMM.) 19/2020 & connected matters.

¶37

Page 4 of 4

¶38

Mahesh Edible Agro Oil Industries Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v. Kalpana Rathore & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahesh Edible Agro Oil Industries Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v. Kalpana Rathore & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R K Jain and Sons Hospitality Services Private Limited Vs New Delhi Municipal Council

R K Jain and Sons Hospitality Services Private Limited Vs New Delhi Municipal Council

Krati Consultancy and Solutions Pvt. Ltd. Vs Broadcast Engineering Consultants India Ltd.

Arun Vohra & Ors. Vs Harish Kumar & Ors.

Murari Lal Agarwal Vs Kmc Construction Limited & Ors.

Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd. Vs Epitome Residency Private Limited & Ors.