Allowed

Sona Blw Precision Forgings Limited v. Practice League Legal Tech Pvt. Ltd.

Delhi HC9 Oct 2024ARB.P./960/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Delhi High Court, under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, appointed Sukhdev Singh as the Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate disputes between Sona Blw Precision Forgings Limited and Practice League Legal Tech Pvt Ltd arising from a Software License Agreement.

What did the court decide?

Appointment of Mr. Sukhdev Singh as Sole Arbitrator; arbitration to be held under DIAC; parties to approach arbitrator within two weeks.

Sona Blw Precision Forgings Limited Vs Practice League Legal Tech… — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~4

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

ARB.P. 960/2024 SONA BLW PRECISION FORGINGS LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Gaurav Bahl, Adv. versus PRACTICE LEAGUE LEGAL TECH PVT LTD .....Respondent Through: Ms. Ria Lohade, Adv.

¶4

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH O R D E R % 09.10.2024

¶5

This is a petition filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of the Sole Arbitrator arising out of a Software License and Service Agreement dated 08.09.2020 .

¶6

The said Agreement contains an arbitration clause being Clause 18 which reads as under:

¶7

Since there were disputes between the parties, the petitioner invoked arbitration vide Notice dated 06.03.2024. Hence the present petition.

¶8

Ms. Lohade, learned counsel appears for the respondent and has no

¶9

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 00:04:20

¶10

objection to the petition being allowed.

¶11

For the said reasons, the petition is allowed and disposed of and the following directions are issued:-

¶12

i) Mr. Sukhdev Singh (Retd. ADJ) (Mob. No. 9910384661) is appointed as a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.

¶13

ii) The arbitration will be held under the aegis of the Delhi International Arbitration Centre, Delhi High Court, Sher Shah Road, New Delhi (hereinafter, referred to as the ‘DIAC’).

¶14

iii) The remuneration of the learned Arbitrator shall be in terms of DIAC (Administrative Cost and Arbitrators’ Fees) Rules, 2018.

¶15

iv) The learned Arbitrator is requested to furnish a declaration in terms of Section 12 of the Act prior to entering into the reference.

¶16

v) It is made clear that all the rights and contentions of the parties, including as to the arbitrability of any of the claim, any other preliminary objection, as well as claims/counter-claims and merits of the dispute of either of the parties, are left open for adjudication by the learned arbitrator.

¶17

vi) The parties shall approach the learned Arbitrator within two weeks from today.

¶18

JASMEET SINGH, J

¶19

OCTOBER 9, 2024/sp

¶20

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶21

Sona Blw Precision Forgings Limited v. Practice League Legal Tech Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sona Blw Precision Forgings Limited v. Practice League Legal Tech Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhikaji Maintenance Combine Vs Santosh Pruthi

Oyo Workspaces India Private Limited Vs Cashgrow Financial Services Private Limited

Tata Capital Limited Vs Shankar Machinery Products & Ors.

M/S Zagson Engineering Ltd. Vs Doosan Power System India Pvt. Ltd.

M/S Manpowergroup Services India Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S Philips India Limited

Manisha Agarwal Vs Ninaniya Estates Ltd.