The High Court of Delhi disposed of a petition seeking appointment of a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as infructuous because the parties had already entered into a Settlement Agreement during the pendency of the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
.....Petitioner
INNOVATIVE PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Neeraj Gupta and Ms. Tajinder Kaur, Advocates.
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J
OCTOBER 07, 2024 S. Zakir
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/10/2024 at 11:59:34
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition for appointment of a sole arbitrator should be disposed of as infructuous following a settlement agreement between the parties.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
BHARATIYA CHATURDHAM VEDA BHAWAN NYAS
INNOVATIVE PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
