Allowed

Doons Caterers v. Indian Railway Catering and Tourism Corporation Ltd. & Anr.

Delhi HC24 Sept 2024ARB.P./796/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Delhi High Court allowed a petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to appoint a Sole Arbitrator for disputes between Doons Caterers and IRCTC regarding welcome drink supplies, and deleted the Union of India from the proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Appointment of Ms. Justice Mukta Gupta (Retd.) as Sole Arbitrator; Union of India deleted from parties; parties to approach arbitrator within two weeks.

Doons Caterers Vs Indian Railway Catering and Tourism Corporation… — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~43

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- ARB.P. 796/2024

¶4

DOONS CATERERS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Puneet Agarwal, Mr. Prem Kandpal and Mr. Chetan Kumar Shukla, Advs.

¶5

versus

¶6

INDIAN RAILWAY CATERING AND TOURISM CORPORATION LTD & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr Ashim Shridhar, Adv. for R-1/IRCTC Mr Bhagvan Swarup Shukla, CGSC with Mr Anirudh, G.P. for R-2/UOI.

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH O R D E R % 24.09.2024

¶9

This is a petition filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an Arbitrator for adjudication of disputes between the parties.

¶10

The petitioner participated in a bid floated by respondent No. 1 for supply of catering service on trains. The petitioner was declared successful and was granted license for a period of 10 years on 3 trains under Master License Agreements dated 21.03.2014 and 24.03.2014.

¶11

The petitioner provided food and beverages in the trains but there is a dispute with regard to supply and rates of the welcome drink.

¶12

The arbitration clause is contained in Clause 8.9 of the three Tripartite Agreements dated 25.07.2017 and 14.08.2017 and reads as under:

¶13

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 00:18:11

¶14

“8.9 In case of any dispute the matter shall be referred for Arbitration to a Sole Arbitrator to be appointed as per Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 as amended from time to time.”

¶15

Since there were disputes between the parties, the petitioner invoked arbitration vide legal notice dated 03.10.2023 and subsequently the present petition has been filed.

¶16

Mr Sridhar, learned counsel for the respondent No.1 on instructions states that the respondent No. 1 has no objection to the disputes being referred to a Sole Arbitrator.

¶17

For the said reasons, the petition is allowed and the following directions are issued:-

¶18

vii) Ms. Justice Mukta Gupta (Retd.) (Mob. No. 9650788600) is appointed as a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.

¶19

viii) The arbitration will be held under the aegis of the Delhi International Arbitration Centre, Delhi High Court, Sher Shah Road, New Delhi (hereinafter, referred to as the ‘DIAC’).

¶20

ix) The remuneration of the learned Arbitrator shall be in terms of DIAC (Administrative Cost and Arbitrators’ Fees) Rules, 2018.

¶21

x) The learned Arbitrator is requested to furnish a declaration in terms of Section 12 of the Act prior to entering into the reference.

¶22

xi) It is made clear that all the rights and contentions of the parties, including as to the arbitrability of any of the claim, any

¶23

¶24

other preliminary objection, as well as claims/counter-claims and merits of the dispute of either of the parties, are left open for adjudication by the learned arbitrator.

¶25

xii) The parties shall approach the learned Arbitrator within two weeks from today.

¶26

Since the dispute is only with respondent No. 1, Mr Shukla, learned CGSC presses that respondent No. 2 be deleted from the array of parties. It is ordered accordingly.

¶27

It is stated by Mr Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner that there is a connected matter being ARB.P.1458/2024 in which he shall be moving an application for early hearing application. Let the needful be done.

¶28

JASMEET SINGH, J

¶29

SEPTEMBER 24, 2024 sr/SP

¶30

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶31

This is a digitally signed order.

¶32

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 00:18:11

Doons Caterers v. Indian Railway Catering and Tourism Corporation Ltd. & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Doons Caterers v. Indian Railway Catering and Tourism Corporation Ltd. & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Aditya Birla Finance Ltd. Vs R M Power System & Anr.

Zodiac Healotronics Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India & Ors.

M/S Meenakshi Metal Industries (Llp), Jhansi (U.P.) Vs M/S Steel Authority of India Ltd.,Bso, Kanpur

Power and Energy Consultants India Private Limited Vs Sjvn Limited

Vinod Seth ( Deceased) through His Legal Heirs Kunal Seth and Anr. Vs Suderdhan Kumar Bhayana (Deceased) through His Legal Heirs Bhupesh Bhayana and Anr.

Bainbridge Navigation Pte Ltd. Vs Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Ltd. and Anr.