Allowed

M/S Nagendra and Co. through Its Partner Mr. Ashok Kumar Chauhan v. M/S Shapoorji Pallonji and Company Pvt. Ltd.

Delhi HC29 Jan 2024ARB.P./723/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Delhi High Court allowed a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an arbitrator. The court referred disputes between the parties to arbitration under the DIAC Rules.

What did the court decide?

Petition allowed; disputes referred to arbitration under DIAC Rules; DIAC requested to nominate arbitrator.

M/S Nagendra and Co. through Its Partner Mr. Ashok Kumar Chauhan… — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~2

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

ARB.P. 723/2023

¶4

M/S NAGENDRA AND CO. THROUGH ITS PARTNER MR. ASHOK KUMAR CHAUHAN ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sandeep Singh Nainwal and Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocates.

¶5

versus

¶6

M/S SHAPOORJI PALLONJI AND COMPANY PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Saurabh Bindal, Ms. Akanksha Batra and Ms. Akshita Salampuria, Advocates.

¶7

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

¶8

O R D E R % 29.01.2024

¶9

By way of this petition, under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [“the Act”], the petitioner seeks appointment of an arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties under an Agreement dated 02.11.2015, read with amendments thereto. The Agreement contains a dispute resolution clause [Clause 13], which provides for reference of disputes to arbitration. The arbitration proceedings were invoked by the petitioner by a legal notice dated 15.04.2023.

¶10

After some hearing, Mr. Saurabh Bindal, learned counsel for the respondent, has taken instructions and submits that the Court may appoint an independent Arbitrator without prejudice to the rights and contentions

¶11

Page 1 of 2

¶12

ARB.P. 723/2023

¶13

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/06/2024 at 11:48:20

¶14

of the respondent on maintainability of the claims raised by the petitioner or on merits.

¶15

I am satisfied that the petitioner has made out a prima-facie case with regard to existence of an arbitration agreement and invocation thereof.

¶16

The petition is, therefore, allowed and the disputes between the parties are referred to arbitration under the aegis of Delhi International Arbitration Centre, Delhi High Court, Shershah Road, New Delhi [“DIAC”]. DIAC is requested to nominate an arbitrator from its panel. The arbitration proceedings will be governed by the Rules of DIAC, including as to remuneration of the learned Arbitrator. The learned Arbitrator is requested to furnish a declaration under Section 12 of the Act, prior to entering upon the reference.

¶17

If the respondent has any counter claims, those may also be placed before the learned arbitrator in accordance with law.

¶18

It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the rights and contentions of the parties on merits, which are reserved for adjudication by the learned Arbitrator.

¶19

The petition stands disposed of.

¶20

PRATEEK JALAN, J

¶21

JANUARY 29, 2024 SS/

¶22

Page 2 of 2

¶23

ARB.P. 723/2023

¶24

This is a digitally signed order.

¶25

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/06/2024 at 11:48:20

M/S Nagendra and Co. through Its Partner Mr. Ashok Kumar Chauhan v. M/S Shapoorji Pallonji and Company Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Nagendra and Co. through Its Partner Mr. Ashok Kumar Chauhan v. M/S Shapoorji Pallonji and Company Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pousny Food and Beverage Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S Lancer Food Products & Anr.

Hk Toll Road Private Limited Vs National Highways Authority of India and Anr.

M/S B. M. Construction Co. Vs Union of India

Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. Vs Sms Limited

Bluestar Infotech Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs Mohd. Rafeeque & Ors.

M/S Ss Tour India & Ors. Vs M/S Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Ltd.