A purely procedural application in an arbitration petition seeking correction of a prior order to record counsel's appearance for the respondent. The court allowed the application without notice and directed the appearance be reflected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~50
..... Petitioner
Through: versus
UNION OF INDIA
..... Respondent Through: Mr. Shashank Garg, CGSC with Ms. Nishtha Jain, Adv.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH O R D E R % 29.05.2024
I.A. 30808/2024 - FOR MODIFICATION OF ORDER DT. 20.05.2024 FOR INCLUSION OF APPEARANCE FOR RESPONDENT
JASMEET SINGH, J
MAY 29, 2024 / (MS)
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 31/05/2024 at 12:02:42
Pragati Construction Consultants
Union of India
Jasmeet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
