Allowed

Joginder Singh Tyagi Prop. M/S Parmar Electrical v. Union of India & Anr.

Delhi HC16 Jul 2024ARB.P./504/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Delhi High Court appointed Mr. Kamlesh Kumar as Sole Arbitrator for disputes between petitioner and respondents under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The appointment was based on a similar pending proceeding.

What did the court decide?

Appointment of Mr. Kamlesh Kumar as Sole Arbitrator; arbitration to be held under DIAC; parties to approach arbitrator within two weeks.

Joginder Singh Tyagi Prop. M/S Parmar Electrical Vs Union of India… — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~4

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- ARB.P. 504/2024

¶4

JOGINDER SINGH TYAGI PROP. M/S PARMAR ELECTRICAL

¶5

.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhishek Semwal, Mr. Amit Dubey, Mr. Aniket Vashishth, Ms. Aradhya Sharma and Mr./Ms. Anshi Mudgal, Advocates alongwith Joginder Singh Tyagi.

¶6

versus

¶7

UNION OF INDIA & ANR.

¶8

.....Respondents Through: Mr.Avtaar Singh Deol, SPC for UOI. Ms. Ekta Choudhary, G. P. alognwith Mr. Divyam Dutt and Ms. Aditi Sharma, Advocates.

¶9

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH

¶10

¶11

O R D E R 16.07.2024

¶12

This is a petition filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of the Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.

¶13

The petitioner was awarded contract on 02.07.2020. On 27.08.2020, the respondent no.1 issued a letter for termination of contract under Clause 5 of the GCC on account of non-compliances.

¶14

In terms of the arbitration clause, the petitioner approached to the

¶15

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 00:17:24

¶16

respondent no.1 on 01.10.2020 and since the disputes were not addressed, the petitioner on 27.11.2020 approached the Superintending Engineer, CPWD, Delhi Circle-06.

¶17

Thereafter, on 06.01.2021 the petitioner approached the next higher authority i.e. ADG under Clause 25(i) of GCC. As the disputes were not settled, the petitioner invoked the arbitration under clause 25(ii) of GCC for appointment of the Sole Arbitrator. The ADG on 17.03.2023 insisted the petitioner to take recourse of DRC and the petitioner on 12.04.2023 submitted its claim to DRC.

¶18

On 21.08.2023, DRC rejected all claims of the petitioner. The petitioner thereafter invoked arbitration vide legal notice dated 17.11.2023. Hence, the present petition. 6. Mr. Singh, learned counsel appears for the respondent and has not filed any reply. There is no opposition to the petition being allowed. 7. Since in ARB P. 505/2024 (Item no. 5), a similar dispute was there between the same parties and Mr. Kamlesh Kumar who is on the panel of CPWD has been appointed as a Sole Arbitrator, in this view of the matter and in order to avoid conflicting judgements, this matter is also referred to Mr. Kamlesh Kumar.

¶19

The arbitration will be held under the aegis of the Delhi International Arbitration Centre, Delhi High Court, Sher Shah Road, New Delhi hereinafter, referred to as the ‘DIAC’). The remuneration of the learned Arbitrator shall be in terms of the Fourth Schedule of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.

¶20

The learned Arbitrator is requested to furnish a declaration in terms of Section 12 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 prior to entering

¶21

¶22

into the reference.

¶23

It is made clear that all the rights and contentions of the parties, including as to the arbitrability of any of the claim, any other preliminary objection, as well as claims/counter-claims on merits of the dispute of either of the parties, are left open for adjudication by the learned arbitrator.

¶24

The parties shall approach the learned Arbitrator within two weeks from today.

¶25

The petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

¶26

JASMEET SINGH, J

¶27

JULY 16, 2024 ssc

¶28

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶29

Joginder Singh Tyagi Prop. M/S Parmar Electrical v. Union of India & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Joginder Singh Tyagi Prop. M/S Parmar Electrical v. Union of India & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amit Vadhera & Anr. Vs M/S Vardhman Infrabuild Pvt. Ltd.

Airen Metals Pvt. Ltd. Vs Kec International Ltd.

Bhikaji Maintenance Combine Vs Kumar Arun Prabhakar

Jully Gupta Vs Indiabulls Investment Advisors Limited and Anr.

Joginder Singh Tyagi Prop. M/S Parmar Electrical Vs Union of India & Anr.

Jitender Bansal Proprietor of Dk Enterprises Vs Spg Consumer Products Private Limited & Anr.