Arbitration petition concerning amenability of respondent No. 2 to arbitration in light of the Supreme Court decision in Cox & Kings Ltd. vs. SAP India (P) Ltd.; counsel sought time, matter re-notified.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
AUSHTA CONSULTING ENGINEERS (I) PVT LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhishek Birthray, Mr. Chandan Sharma and Mr. Nikhil Sharma, Advocates.
versus
MANIPUR TRIBAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr. David Ahongsangbam and Mr. S. Gunabanta Meitei, Advocates for R-1 via video-conferencing. Mr. Pinaki Addy and Ms. Neetu Singh, Advocates for R-2 via videoconferencing.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI O R D E R % 18.01.2024
Pursuant to what was recorded in last order dated 08.01.2024, the court has queried Mr. Pinaki Addy, learned counsel for respondent No. 2 as to the amenability of the said respondent to arbitration in the context of the recent verdict of the Supreme Court in Cox & Kings Ltd. vs. SAP India (P) Ltd.1
Mr. Addy seeks some time to address the court on the aforesaid query. At request, re-notify on 07th February 2024.
ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J
JANUARY 18, 2024/ uj
1 2023 SCC OnLine SC 1634
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/06/2024 at 15:04:00
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Cox & Kings Ltd. vs. SAP India (P) Ltd.Referred¶8
2023 SCC OnLine SC 1634 · Who else cites this
Aushta Consulting Engineers (I) Pvt Ltd
Manipur Tribal Development Corporation Limited
Anup Jairam Bhambhani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
