The奇艺 Delhi High Court allowed an application for withdrawal of an arbitration petition after findings of settlement between parties. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn subject to the binding terms of the settlement.
Application allowed; Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~35
KAMESHKUMAR A PATEL, PROPRIETOR OF M/S. ADVANCE ENTERPRISE .....Petitioner Through: Mr Samiron Borkataky, Ms Sanskriti Shrimali and Mr Ikshvaaku Marwah, Advs. (through VC)
versus
CINDA ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD.
.....Respondent
Through: Mr Gauhar Mirza, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH O R D E R % 12.09.2024
I.A. 39259/2024
JASMEET SINGH, J SEPTEMBER 12, 2024/ sr Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/09/2024 at 12:06:38
KAMESHKUMAR A PATEL, PROPRIETOR OF M/S. ADVANCE ENTERPRISE
CINDA ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD.
JASMEET SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
