Petitioner sought release of an income tax refund. The respondent stated on instructions that the refund had been processed and released; the Court disposed of the writ petition as nothing further survived.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~13
versus
INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Puneet Rai, SSC with Mr. Ashwini, Mr. Rishabh Nangia, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA
O R D E R % 23.09.2024
Mr Rai, learned counsel appearing for the respondent, on instructions states that the refund payable to the petitioner has been duly processed and released.
In view of the aforesaid and since nothing further would survive, the writ petition shall consequently stand disposed of.
YASHWANT VARMA, J.
RAVINDER DUDEJA, J.
SEPTEMBER 23, 2024/neha
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/09/2024 at 12:55:00
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Income Tax Department should process and release the refund due to the petitioner.
Samtel Glass Limited
Income Tax Department
Anr.
Yashwant Varma
Ravinder Dudeja
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
