The High Court of Delhi rejected the writ petition as the petitioner had already approached the Appellate Tribunal, MCD. Liberty was granted to pursue the remedy before the Tribunal.
Liberty granted to pursue remedy before AT-MCD; AT-MCD directed to expedite hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~41
RAJESH KUMAR CHOPRA .....Petitioner
versus
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ANR
.....Respondents Through: Ms. Radhika Bishwaji, ASC for MCD with Mr. Karan Khetani, Ms. Drishti Rawal and Mr. Kritarth Upadhyay, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
SEPTEMBER 12, 2024 p’ma
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 09:20:00
Rajesh Kumar Chopra
Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
