Petitioner expired before the Court. Legal heirs expressed no interest in proceeding. The High Court found no cause to keep the petition pending and held it has abated. No substantive order or relief was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~29
Through: Mr. Yashaswi S.K. Chocksey, Adv. Versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS.....Respondents Through: Mr. Vishal Raj Sehijpal, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA O R D E R % 23.09.2024
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
SACHIN DATTA, J
SEPTEMBER 23, 2024 ‘gsr’ Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 02:03:42
JAI PRAKASH
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS.
VIBHU BAKHRU
SACHIN DATTA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
