The High Court of Delhi regularized the petitioner's provisional admission into Class Nursery/Pre-School for the academic year 2023-2024, directing the school to continue educating her as an EWS student under the RCE Act, 2009.
Provisional admission granted to the petitioner was regularized; petitioner to continue as EWS student.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~14
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
BABY ANANYA EKKA ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Vivek Kumar Tandon and Ms. Prerna Tandon, Advs
versus
THE INDIAN SCHOOL
SECOND SHIFT & ANR. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Pramod Gupta, Adv. for Respondent 1
Mr. Utkarsh Singh, Adv. for Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi, Standing Counsel (C) for the DoE
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL)
%
17.05.2024
W.P.(C) 9431/2023
1. Mr. Pramod Gupta, learned Counsel for the respondent school submits with commendable fairness that this case is covered by the judgment of Jai v. Directorate of Education1 , Arpit v. Adriel High School2 and Deepak Raj v. The Principal Apeejay School3 and that this Court may pass appropriate direction for regularization of provisional admission of the petitioner as granted by the respondent school consequent to the interim order passed by this Court.
1 2024 SCC OnLine Del 2537
2 Order dated 30 April 2024 in WP (C) 2848/2024
Signature Not Verified3 Order dated 3 Ma y 2024 in WP ( C ) 14843/2023
Signature Not Verified Page 1 of 2 Digitally Signed By:CHANDRASHEKHAR AN HARI SHANKAR Signing Da te:19 .05.2024 18:17
Digitally Signed WP(C) 9431/2023 By:AJIT KUMAR Signing Date:19.0 5.20 24 18:18
2. Accordingly, provisional admission granted to the petitioner consequent to the interim order passed by this Court in Class Nursery/Pre-School in 2023-2024 is regularized.
3. The petitioner shall continue to be educated as an EWS student by the respondent school in accordance with the provisions of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 in that regard.
4. The petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
MAY 17, 2024 rb
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
Signature Not Verified
Signature Not Verified
Page 2 of 2 Digitally Signed By:CHANDRASHEKHAR AN HARI SHANKAR Signing Da te:19 .05.2024 18:17
WP(C) 9431/2023
Digitally Signed By:AJIT KUMAR Signing Date:19.0 5.20 24 18:18
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's provisional admission should be regularized based on precedent.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Jai v. Directorate of EducationReferred¶1
Jai v. Directorate of Education, Para 1, Footnote 1: 2024 SCC OnLine Del 2537 · Who else cites this
BABY ANANYA EKKA
THE INDIAN SCHOOL
C. HARI SHANKAR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
