Petitioners aggrieved by sealing/demolition following revocation of their sanctioned building plan by MCD sought interim relief, noting the appellate tribunal lacked a Presiding Officer. The court disposed of the writ petition, directing that no coercive steps be taken until the tribunal adjudicates interim relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~81
Through: Mr. Manoj Kumar and Mr. Ajay Sharma, Advs.
versus
MCD .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ashutosh Gupta, ASC for MCD.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
CM APPL. 38340/2024 (Ex.)
W.P.(C) 9352/2024 & CM APPL. 38341/2024 (stay)
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/07/2024 at 15:19:44
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
JULY 10, 2024/p
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/07/2024 at 15:19:44
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should grant interim protection against sealing/demolition while the petitioner awaits hearing before the Appellate Tribunal-MCD on a revoked building plan.
Maxwell S. Koty & Ors.
MCD
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
