The court dismissed a CM application filed in a disposed writ petition. The applicant sought directions to a Block Development Officer to hear his representation. The court held the application was not maintainable as it pertained to a concluded matter or a fresh cause of action.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~79
ANIL SAINI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Medhanshu Tripathi and Mr.Paranjay Tripathi, Advocates.
versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI
THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vanshay Kaul, Advocate for Mr.Sameer Vashisht, ASC for Respondent/GNCTD.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH O R D E R
% 20.08.2024
CM APPL. 47633/2024
ii. Pass an appropriate order directing extension of the order dated 26.08.2019 directing stay until such time that the BDO (North) decides the representation dated 26.07.2024 addressed by the Petitioner;”
JYOTI SINGH, J
AUGUST 20, 2024
B.S. Rohella
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/08/2024 at 12:22:58
Anil Saini
Government of NCT of Delhi
Jyoti Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
