The petitioner failed to appear on multiple hearing dates. The High Court dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution.
The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~R-198
M/S BHUPESH ADVERTISING P. LTD ..... Petitioner
Through: None.
versus
RAM SURESH THAKUR & ORS. .....Respondents
Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
No one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner even on second call. On the last occasions also i.e. 22.01.2019, 23.01.2019, 13.11.2019 and 23.01.2024, there was no appearance on behalf of the petitioner. It seems that the petitioner does not wish to pursue this matter any further.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J
FEBRUARY 5, 2024 rk/db
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/12/2024 at 14:34:56
M/S BHUPESH ADVERTISING P. LTD
RAM SURESH THAKUR
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
