Petitioner had challenged a provisional attachment of its bank account ordered by DGGI Gurugram, its Rule 159(5) objections having gone undecided. After a speaking order decided the objections during pendency, the petitioner withdrew the petition with liberty to pursue other remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~10
..... Petitioner
Through Mr.Jitin Singhal, Advocate. versus
PADG, DGGI, GURUGRAM ZONAL UNIT
..... Respondent
Through Mr.Harpreet Singh, Sr. SC and Ms.Suhani Mathur, Mr.Jatin Kumar Gaur, Ms.Deepshika Sharma, Ms.Kusum Chopra, Mr.Rakesh Kumar Antil, Ms.Amrita Bhadauria, Mr.Amit Kashyap and Ms.Prtika Nagpal, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA
O R D E R
W.P.(C) 8824/2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/07/2024 at 14:50:34
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
SACHIN DATTA, J
JULY 01, 2024 r
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/07/2024 at 14:50:34
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging provisional attachment of a bank account remained maintainable after the objections under Rule 159(5) CGST Rules were decided by a speaking order.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
KHUSHI MEDIA
PADG, DGGI, GURUGRAM ZONAL UNIT
Vibhu Bakhru
Sachin Datta
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
