High Court disposed of W.P.(C) 8639/2024 and CM APPL. 35375/2024 as the main prayer became infructuous, allowing petitioners liberal liberty to seek refund via representation.
Petition disposed of with liberty to file representation to respondent No. 3 for refund of fees.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~18
MAHIKAA PATHAK & ORS. .....Petitioners
Through: Mr. Tarun Diwan and Ms. Pyari, Advs.
versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Nishant Gautam, CGSC with Ms. Sanjana Mehrotra and Mr. Arindam Sarin, Advs. for R-1. Mr. Sanjiv K. Jha and Mr. Sachin Bhatt, Advs. for R-3. Mr. Sanjay Khanna, SC Ms. Pragya Bhushan, Karandeep Singh, Tarandeep Singh, Advs. for NTA/R4.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R % 07.11.2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/11/2024 at 11:32:47
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
NOVEMBER 7, 2024/p
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/11/2024 at 11:32:47
MAHIKAA PATHAK & ORS.
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
