dispossessed illegally from the actual and physical possession of the suit property as the scope of relief under Section 6 of the Act is limited. 30. While deciding the issue of possession in favour of the respondent, the learned Trial Court conjointly perused the evidence placed on record by the respondent, consisting of his Adhaar Card, copy of assessment under Section 123-D of the MCD Act, copy of BSES bill, telephone bill as well as challan receipts, which reflects the address of the suit property, thereby proving that the respondent was in actual and physical possession of the suit property. 31. Furthermore, while dealing with the issue of limitation as provided under the Section 6(2)(a) of the Act, the learned Trial Court took into consideration the fact that the respondent had gone to his native place in March, 2018 and upon his return, he was apprised of his dispossession from the suit property on 12th April, 2018. It is further noted by the learned Trial Court that the respondent got his possession over the suit property, however no such date was on record. Thereafter, the respondent left to his native place in December, 2018, however taking advantage of his absence, he found that the petitioner had put a lock on the said suit property on 26th December, 2018, thereby dispossessing him from the suit property. In view of the same, the suit was filed on 10th May, 2019 and it was held by the learned Trial Court that the respondent filed the said suit in question within the stipulated time of six months from the date of dispossession.
