Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh upon counsel's submission that petition's language was not up to judicial standards.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~44
DIVYA MATTEY & ORS. .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Sandeep Gupta, Adv. Mr. Vishant Prakash, Adv. versus
GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS.
| .....R | espo | ndents | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Through: | Mr.Santosh Kumar |
Tr | ipathi, |
| SC(Civil), GNCTD/D |
OE | and | |
| Mr.Utkarsh Singh, Adv. | |||
| Mr.Puneet Mittal, Sr. |
Adv | with | |
| Mr.R.P.Singh and |
Mr. | Sakshi | |
| Mendiratta, Advs for R-3. |
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R % 23.10.2024
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
OCTOBER 23, 2024/MJ
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/10/2024 at 12:13:20
Divya Mathey
Government of NCT of Delhi
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
