The High Court of Delhi, in a withdrawal petition, granted permission to withdraw the original writ subject to liberty to approach civil court, extending the operation of stay orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~7
DILIP KATYAL .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Pavan Narang, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Neha Tandon, Mr. Himanshu Sethi, Ms. Aishwarya Chhabra, Advocates.
versus BSES YAMUNA POWER LTD & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Moksh Arora, Mr. Santosh Ramdurg, Advocates for R-1. Ms. Sunieta Ojha, SC with Ms. Vasudha Priyansha, Ms. Divita Vashisht, Advocates for MCD.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
O R D E R
% 16.12.2024
Page 1 of 2
W.P.(C) 7925/2008
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/12/2024 at 13:05:36
PRATEEK JALAN, J
DECEMBER 16, 2024/ ‘Bhupi’/AL/
Page 2 of 2
W.P.(C) 7925/2008
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/12/2024 at 13:05:36
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
W.P.(C) 9215/2007Referred¶1
DILIP KATYAL
BSES YAMUNA POWER LTD & ORS
PRATEEK JALAN
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
