Petitioner sought withdrawal of the present petition after settling the dispute with respondent no. 2 via an agreement dated 29.08.2024.
Petition allowed to be dismissed as withdrawn as compromised.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~38
versus THE STATE THROUGH ADM OFFICE AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Divyam Nandrajog, Panel Counsel, GNCTD with Mr. Prakhyat Gargasya, Advocate for R-1 Mr. Karan Khanuja and Ms. Sakshi Kumari, Advocates for R-2
CORAM:
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN O R D E R % 10.09.2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/09/2024 at 12:25:30
directed to execute the terms and conditions as contained in settlement agreement dated 29.08.2024. However, either of the parties shall be at liberty to approach this Court in case of altered circumstances.
DR. SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN, J
SEPTEMBER 10, 2024 N/AK
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/09/2024 at 12:25:30
SMT. ANITA
THE STATE THROUGH ADM OFFICE
ORS.
SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
