Petitioner withdrew the writ petition as respondents were considering its representation; court dismissed it as withdrawn with liberty to re-approach, expressly taking no position on maintainability.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to re-approach if the representation is not accepted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~101
BHARTIYA PURATATVA SMARAK PHOTOGRAPHERS ASSOCIATION .....Petitioner Through: Mr. V. Shashank Kumar, Advocate.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Jitesh Vikram Srivastava, SPC.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
O R D E R % 11.07.2024
SANJEEV NARULA, J
JULY 11, 2024/ nk
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/07/2024 at 15:18:50
Bhartiya Puratatva Smarak Photographers Association
Union of India
Sanjeev Narula
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
