Writ petition challenging transfer and movement orders. Respondents' counsel stated the impugned orders qua the petitioner had been recalled; with nothing left to adjudicate, the Division Bench disposed of the petition, leaving the petitioner free to pursue remedies against any future transfer order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~9
CHATURBHUJ RORWALIYA .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Ratnesh Sharma, Adv.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS .....Respondents Through: Mr.Nishant Gautam & Mr.Rajat Rajoria, Advs.
CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR O R D E R % 05.07.2024
REKHA PALLI, J
SHALINDER KAUR, J
JULY 5, 2024 kk
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 00:58:24
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition survives after the respondents recalled the impugned transfer and movement orders against the petitioner.
Chaturbhuj Rorwaliya
Union of India and Others
Rekha Palli
Shalinder Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
